Google agrees to pay $90 million in “click fraud” suit
Click fraud is a serious problem in the contextual-marketing space. Malicious folks can click on a rival’s text ad in an attempt to drain that competitor of its online ad budget. And in Google’s AdSense program that serves the search engine’s ads on third-party sites, shady publishers click on ads on their own sites to enrich their thieved coffers.
Related newsGoogle agrees to pay $90 mln in “click fraud” suit Dow Closes Up 43, Nasdaq Finishes Down 12 Japanese Stocks Bounce Back; Dollar Down Aftermarket Movers: Traders Go to Petco Inflation Slows Sharply in February
Google is pretty good about catching the cyberspace criminals. It has to. When 99% of your revenue comes from advertising — and you’re valued as a $105 billion company — you have little choice but to make sure you protect the purity of your bread and butter.
Some argue that Google may be lax on policing for click frauds because it stands to lose money if it cracks down even harder. But that’s just ridiculous. Think about it — advertisers are able to track conversion rates online. If click fraud deflates the effectiveness of a campaign, sponsors will just bid lower on future clicks, and that’s money out of Google’s pocket in the long run.
Click fraud hurts everyone. Advertisers are cheated out of their money. Google and legitimate third-party publishers then earn less for qualified leads. With so much at stake, it’s really just a matter of time before Google goes after click bandits legally to set an example. It does credit its advertisers when it discovers fraudulent clicks, but it may never be possible to catch and correct all of the cases.
Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO) was also named in the lawsuit, but it isn’t looking to settle. Because the company has just launched its own AdSense clone — Yahoo! Publisher Network — click fraud is probably less of a problem there. However, Yahoo! sponsors have to bid at least a dime for every click. Google allows its advertisers to bid as little as a penny for an interested click. Even though most keyword bids are for far greater sums than that, the high minimum at Yahoo! means that this isn’t litigation that can be scoffed at. Potential click fraud on its network would add up quickly.
Search marketing is still in its infancy. Click fraud is just one of the nascent industry’s speed bumps. Smaller players like LookSmart (Nasdaq: LOOK) and MIVA (Nasdaq: MIVA) have dealt with click fraud accusations by sponsors claiming low conversion rates, but some have also had to cope with suspect sponsors, too.
It isn’t a perfect medium, but at least it is more accountable than more conventional advertising formats. It’s why Inside Value recommendation Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) is diving in with AdCenter and also why IAC/InterActive (Nasdaq: IACI) is looking to follow suit on Ask.com.
It’s the way of the future. Let’s hope for a little more honesty and transparency in the future.
Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz is a huge fan of Google, and it would be his homepage if it weren’t for Fool.com. He does not own shares in any of the companies in this story.The Fool has a disclosure policy. He is also part of theRule Breakersnewsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow’s ultimate growth stocks a day early.
No Responses to “Google agrees to pay $90 million in “click fraud” suit”
Other topics you might enjoy: Coalition Films - Strongest Directories - Adwords Management
~ Thanks for taking the time to check out my site. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own website if you want. If you're ever in Portland, Oregon be sure to check out the Saucebox.
It's the best restaurant in town.
